EDHEC-Risk Concept Industry Analysis Featured Analysis Latest EDHEC-Risk Surveys Features Interviews Indexes and Benchmarking FTSE EDHEC-Risk Efficient Index Series FTSE EDHEC-Risk ERAFP SRI Index EDHEC-Risk Alternative Indexes EDHEC-Risk IEIF Commercial Property Indices Hedge Fund Index Research Equity Index Research Amundi ETF "Core-Satellite and ETF Investment" Research Chair EDHEC-Risk Institute Solvency II Benchmarks Performance and Risk Reporting Hedge Fund Performance EuroPerformance/EDHEC-Risk Institute Style Ratings Performance Measurement for Traditional Investment CACEIS "New Frontiers in Risk Assessment and Performance Reporting" Research Chair Asset Allocation and Alternative Diversification Real Assets Meridiam Infrastructure/Campbell Lutyens "Infrastructure Equity Investment Management and Benchmarking" Research Chair Natixis "Investment and Governance Characteristics of Infrastructure Debt Instruments" Research Chair Newedge "Advanced Modelling for Alternative Investments" Research Chair CME Group "Exploring the Commodity Futures Risk Premium: Implications for Asset Allocation and Regulation" Strategic Research Project Asset Allocation and Derivative Instruments Eurex "The Benefits of Volatility Derivatives in Equity Portfolio Management" Strategic Research Project SGCIB "Structured Investment Strategies" Research ALM and Asset Allocation Solutions ALM and Private Wealth Management AXA Investment Managers "Regulation and Institutional Investment" Research Chair BNP Paribas Investment Partners "ALM and Institutional Investment Management" Research Chair Deutsche Bank "Asset-Liability Management Techniques for Sovereign Wealth Fund Management" Research Chair Ontario Teachers' Pension Plan "Advanced Investment Solutions for Liability Hedging for Inflation Risk" Research Chair Rothschild & Cie "The Case for Inflation-Linked Corporate Bonds: Issuers' and Investors' Perspectives" Research Chair Russell Investments "Solvency II" Research Chair Non-Financial Risks, Regulation and Innovations Best Execution: MiFID and TCA Mitigating Hedge Funds Operational Risks FBF "Innovations and Regulations in Investment Banking" Research Chair EDHEC-Risk Publications All EDHEC-Risk Publications EDHEC-Risk Position Papers IPE EDHEC-Risk Institute Research Insights Books EDHEC-Risk Newsletter Events Events organised by EDHEC-Risk Institute "Investing in Smart Beta" European Seminar Series: Frankfurt (14 June, 2013), Vienna (28 June, 2013) "Investing in Smart Beta" European Seminar Series: Stockholm (17 June, 2013), Oslo (18 June, 2013), Helsinki (19 June, 2013) "Investing in Smart Beta" North American Seminar Series: San Francisco (2 July, 2013) "Investing in Smart Beta" European Seminar Series: Zurich (4 July, 2013) "Smart Beta 2.0" North American Seminar Series: Boston (9 July, 2013), New York (10 July, 2013), Toronto (11 July, 2013), San Francisco (23 July, 2013) "Investing in Smart Beta" European Seminar Series: London (10 July, 2013) EDHEC-Risk Days North America 2013, New York, 8-9 October, 2013 Events involving EDHEC-Risk Institute's participation EDHEC-Risk Institute Presentation Research Programmes Research Chairs and Strategic Research Projects Partnership International Advisory Board Team EDHEC-Risk News EDHEC-Risk Newsletter EDHEC-Risk Press Releases EDHEC-Risk in the Press Careers EDHEC Risk Institute-Asia EDHEC Business School EDHEC-Risk Executive Education EDHEC-Risk Institute PhD in Finance Investment Management Seminars Advanced Commodity Investment Seminar, New York, 29-30 May, 2013 CFA Institute/EDHEC-Risk Advances in Asset Allocation Seminar, London, 4-6 June, 2013 CFA Institute/EDHEC-Risk Advances in Asset Allocation Seminar, New York, 16-18 July, 2013 Execution and Trading on Equity Markets - The New Landscape Seminar, Singapore, 31 July, 2013 Contact EDHEC-Risk Executive Education Contact Us ERI Scientific Beta
Indexes
Far from the Madding Crowd – Volatility Efficient Indices
Authors: Frank Nielsen, Raman Aylursubramanian
Source: MSCI Barra Research Insights
Date: April 2008

Nielsen and Aylursubramanian note a recent rise in the popularity of minimum variance strategies and propose to develop a global minimum volatility index to serve as a benchmark for evaluating these strategies. Initially introduced by Markowitz (1952), the minimum variance (MV) portfolio is not only the efficient frontier portfolio with the lowest risk for a given set of assets, but also the one that can be computed without estimating expected asset returns.

According to the Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM, Sharpe, 1964), any combination of the market portfolio and the risk-free asset should dominate the MV portfolio in terms of efficiency. Nielsen and Aylursubramanian recall that the CAPM is based on various assumptions that do not meet realistic market conditions. In addition, the capitalisation-weighted indices serving as proxy for the market portfolio may not be efficient. As a result, it is possible to produce an empirical MV portfolio dominating an empirical market line constructed using a cap-weighted index. Among others, the major explanation proposed to explain the empirically observed superiority of the MV portfolio is that this portfolio is free from errors in expected return estimation (for example, see Chora and Ziemba, 1993). Building MV portfolios is thus a safe way to produce efficient portfolios.

Using the MSCI World Index security universe, the authors propose to derive a minimum variance index. The index was constructed using the global equity covariance matrix from the Barra Global Equity Model, which is supposed to be more robust than a covariance matrix created using historical returns. The major concerns in the construction rules were to ensure a replicable and investable index. For example, minimum and maximum constraints are imposed on assets, sectors and countries, in order to ensure index diversification. Another rule is to limit the turnover to 10% at each semi-annual rebalancing. This MV index, named the MSCI World MV Index, was computed from June 1995 to December 2007.

The authors present the performance characteristics of the MSCI World MV Index and compare them to the MSCI World Index and to a long duration US Fixed Income Index. Compared to the MSCI World Index, the MV index produces higher returns with a volatility about 30% lower, over the whole period of investigation (1995-2007). During an expansionary period (tech boom and internet bubble), the MSCI World index produced higher returns than the MV index. Conversely, the MV index outperformed during the recessionary period (when the bubble burst). Further, the authors observed a loss of 45% for the MSCI World Index between the top (March 2000) and the bottom (March 2003) of the tech boom, while the MV index encountered a loss of only 18% during the same period, which makes them conclude that the MV index offers downside protection compared to the cap-weighted index. In addition, over the 1995-2007 period, the MV index risk appears to be comparable to the risk of the long duration fixed income index. Finally, looking at the worst monthly declines, MV index losses are lower than those of the MSCI World Index and comparable to those encountered by the fixed-income index. In conclusion, the MV index can serve as a natural hedge against increasing market volatility.

Finally, the authors present the potential applications of the MV index. This index constitutes a suitable benchmark for investors using low volatility equity strategies, e.g. corporate pension plans or insurance companies. Considering, for example, a portfolio made up of 60% equity and 40% fixed income, the authors observed a 20% decrease in the risk with a minimum variance allocation, compared to a traditional allocation, during two periods, one ending in December 2007 and the other ending in April 2001.

The authors present the MSCI MV World Index as the first global benchmark for managed volatility equity strategies. This index has been designed to be transparent, easily replicable and fully investable, as drawn from the MSCI World Standard Index universe. Thus, they suggest it can serve as a support for index products and exchange-traded funds. The performance characteristics found here for the MV index are consistent with earlier studies focusing on the US and European markets. The present study is original compared to other studies on minimum variance portfolios, as it is not restricted to domestic or regional markets, but extended to the global market.

References

Chopra, V. K. and W. T. Ziemba, “The Effects of Errors in Means, Variances, and Covariances on Optimal Portfolio Choice”, Journal of Portfolio Management , vol. 19, n°2, 2003, p. 6-11.

Markowitz, H., “Portfolio Selection”, Journal of Finance , vol. 7, n°1, 1952, p. 77-91.

Sharpe, W., “Capital Asset Prices: A Theory of Market Equilibrium under Conditions of Risk”, Journal of Finance , vol. 19, n°3, 1964, p. 425-442.

Related links

Full text