EDHEC-Risk Concept
Industry Analysis
Featured Analysis
Latest EDHEC-Risk Surveys
Research News
Research Papers
Books
Features
Interviews
Indexes and Benchmarking
EDHEC-Risk Efficient Equity Indices
Equity Index Research
EDHEC-Risk Alternative Indexes
EDHEC-Risk IEIF Commercial Property Indices
Hedge Fund Indices Literature
EDHEC-Risk's Position on the Eligibility of Hedge Fund Indices for UCITS
Assessing the Quality of Stock Market Indices
EDHEC-Risk European ETF Survey
Core-Satellite Investing
Amundi ETF "Core-Satellite and ETF Investment" Research Chair
Style and Performance Analysis
Hedge Fund Performance
EuroPerformance/EDHEC-Risk Institute Style Ratings
Alpha League Table
IPE/EDHEC-Risk Institute Institutional Asset Management Awards (IAMA)
Rating the Ratings
Performance Measurement for Traditional Investment
Asset Allocation and Alternative Diversification
EDHEC-Risk European Alternative Diversification Practices Survey
Hedge Fund Style Allocation
EDHEC-Risk Funds of Hedge Funds Reporting Survey
The Amaranth Case
The Hedge Fund Debate
Core-Satellite Investing
Newedge "Advanced Modelling for Alternative Investments" Research Chair
Asset Allocation and Derivative Instruments
Structured Forms of Investment Strategies
Use of Derivatives in Asset Management
FBF "Structured Products and Derivatives" Research Chair
ALM and Asset Management
Solvency II
Impact of IFRS & Solvency II on ALM & AM in Insurance Companies
Managing Pension Assets
Benefits of Hedge Funds in ALM
ALM Decisions in Private Banking
AXA Investment Managers "Regulation and Institutional Investment" Research Chair
BNP Paribas Investment Partners "ALM and Institutional Investment Management" Research Chair
ORTEC Finance "Private Asset-Liability Management" Research Chair
Deutsche Bank "Asset-Liability Management Techniques for Sovereign Wealth Fund Management" Research Chair
UFG "Dynamic Allocation Models and New Forms of Target-Date Funds for Private and Institutional Clients" Research Chair
Rothschild & Cie "The Case for Inflation-Linked Bonds: Issuers' and Investors' Perspectives" Research Chair
Operational Risks and Performance
MiFID
TCA in Europe: Current & Best Practices
Mitigating Hedge Funds Operational Risks
CACEIS "Risk and Regulation in the European Fund Management Industry" Research Chair
EDHEC-Risk Publications
Reports, Studies, Surveys and Position Papers
Academic Publications
All EDHEC-Risk Publications
Investment Management Review
Editorial Policy
Subscriptions
Events
Events organised by EDHEC-Risk Institute
CFA Institute/EDHEC-Risk Institute Alternative Asset Allocation Seminar, London, 16-18 March 2010
CFA Institute/EDHEC-Risk Institute Alternative Asset Allocation Seminar, New York, 30 March-1 April 2010
CFA Institute/EDHEC-Risk Institute Advances in Asset Allocation Seminar, Singapore, 18-20 May 2010
Conférence de la Gestion Institutionnelle Française 2010, Paris, 8-9 juin 2010
CFA Institute/EDHEC-Risk Institute Advances in Asset Allocation Seminar, New York, 13-15 July 2010
EDHEC-Risk Institutional Days 2010, Monaco, 8-9 December, 2010
Events involving EDHEC-Risk Institute's participation
EDHEC-Risk Institute
Presentation
Research Programmes
Research Chairs
International Advisory Board
Partners
Team
EDHEC-Risk News
Press Releases
EDHEC-Risk in the Press
Careers
EDHEC Business School
EDHEC-Risk Executive Education
EDHEC-Risk Institute PhD in Finance
EDHEC-Risk Institute Executive MSc in Risk and Investment Management
Investment Management Seminars
Contact Us
Contact Us
|
EDHEC-Risk Institute/EuroPerformance Alpha League Table

The Reference Rankings in Europe
EDHEC-Risk Institute and EuroPerformance have set up the first European ranking of asset management firms based on an accurate measure of risk-adjusted performance: the Alpha League Table.
The Alpha League Table evaluates asset management firms in terms of their equity management and their ability to deliver alpha. As an absolute arithmetic magnitude that does not depend on any category, alpha levels are easily comparable.
Finance professionals have shown considerable interest in this new alpha-based performance measure, developed using the EuroPerformance/EDHEC-Risk Institute Style Ratings. Cutting-edge techniques provide a true measure of risk-adjusted performance (alpha), while taking into account extreme risk and persistence of outperformance.
It is our ambition that this analysis will become the primary reference in the ranking of asset management companies.
Background
In November 2004 in Paris, EDHEC-Risk Institute and EuroPerformance presented the first fund ratings based on alpha: the EuroPerformance/EDHEC -Risk Institute Style Ratings.
These ratings provide a response to both academic and professional criticism directed at traditional fund ratings. The latter rely on relative rankings defined within categories that do not take the risks that were really taken by the manager over the analysis period into account and do not therefore allow the performance of active management to be evaluated and rewarded, whether the performance comes from stock picking or tactical allocation.
In 2005, on the basis of the Style Ratings, EDHEC-Risk Institute and EuroPerformance set up special rankings to distinguish European asset management companies according to their capacity to deliver alpha for all of their "equity" funds: the Alpha League Table.
For each company rated, the Alpha League Table highlights its alpha intensity, which is constructed from two indicators:- The average alpha, which gives the value of the average alpha for the funds that outperformed their benchmark
- The frequency of alpha, which represents the percentage of funds that have a positive alpha
These annual rankings cover major geographical areas: France, Spain & Italy, Switzerland and the United Kingdom.
The Alpha League Table by Country
France
Alpha League Table France 2009
The fourth ranking for France reveals that, in keeping with the generalised fall of equity markets, we have witnessed a genuine downturn in the production of alpha. For this fourth ranking of twenty five French asset management firms, the alpha generated in 2008 comes to 1.78%, well below the 2.50% of the previous year. By contrast, the average frequency of alpha (the percentage of funds generating positive alpha) rose slightly (+2.21%) to 29.81%.
- In the top spot is the independent firm Carmignac Gestion (up four places). The firm earns this spot for its equity management; vehicles invested in Europe shares did particularly well. More than half of its rated funds
generated alpha, for an average of 3.62%.
- State Street Global Advisors (France) climbs from third place last year to second place this year. As is the norm for quantitative management, the frequency of alpha (48.16%) is high, although it has fallen -5% from last year. The average alpha of 3.36% is one of the highest in the table.
- Comgest, up three places from last year, takes third place in the rankings. The independent asset management firm posts a slight improvement in the frequency of alpha (41.97%) and average alpha is up 0.3% to 2.87%.
Download the Alpha League Table France 2009
[Consult previous editions]
Spain & Italy
Alpha League Table Spain and Italy 2008
This third edition of the rankings of Spanish and Italian asset management firms shows a fall in the alpha generated by the firms in the rankings. Average alpha for Spain fell from 2.38% to 2.08% and for Italy from 1.53% to 1.14%. These figures compare unfavourably with the average alpha for asset management companies in Europe overall of 2.48%.
- Monte dei Paschi di Siena takes first place in Italy, with a score of 0.39%. Gruppo Ubi Banca is second, up two places from last year. Its score of 0.36 is the result of a significant increase (66 basis points) in its average alpha, which stands at 1.33% this year. Pioneer Investments, in second place last year, is now ranked third. This firm has the widest range of funds of the firms in our rankings. In fourth place is last year’s winner: Gruppo Banca Intermobiliare, whose decline is largely the result of its inability to maintain last year’s high level of alpha. For the second year in a row, Gruppo Bipiemme is in fifth place.
- For Spain, Bankinter is once again in first place, with a score of 1.49 obtained on the strength of alpha of 3.22% and a very respectable frequency of 46.79%, the highest of any firm in the Spanish rankings. Ibercaja Gestión is ranked second, with an average alpha at 3.13%, which is among the highest of any Spanish bank. Gesmadrid, which was in seventh place last year, is now third. Renta 4 Gestora takes fourth place (up one from last year). In fifth place, falling one place from last year, is Bancaja Fondos. A fall in average alpha is entirely responsible for this slide.
- As in France, Germany, and the Netherlands, asset management in Italy and Spain suffered from significant withdrawals of investors in 2007, according to the European Fund and Asset Management Association (EFAMA). One of the reasons for the poor results of Italian asset management, relative to the European average, is the country’s tax regime. The defining characteristic of the Spanish market is the overwhelming presence of banks in the asset management industry. A large majority of the assets under management are held by banks or managed by their asset management affiliates.
Download the Alpha League Table Spain & Italy 2008
[Consult previous editions]
Switzerland
Alpha League Table Switzerland 2008
The Alpha League Table 2008 for Switzerland reveals that:
- The private bank Sarasin takes the top spot. After having ranked third in 2006 and second in 2007, the firm confirms the excellent results of its equity management and shows that it is one of the leaders of active management in Switzerland.
- With a score of 1.84, the specialised asset managers Vontobel are in second place. Excellent results are obtained over a wide range of equity funds. Some twenty investment vehicles delivered returns in excess of their benchmarks, an achievement that has become a veritable Vontobel trademark. Third in the rankings, with a score of 1.22, is the bank Swisscanto, third last year as well. Alpha is delivered by the bank in six categories and comes to 2.91%. The gain frequency of 41.6% is an improvement on last year.
- For this 2008 edition of the Swiss Alpha League Table, the alpha delivered by equity management comes to 2.31%. The average frequency of alpha improves (+50 basis points) to 38.5%.
- Most outperforming funds are to be found in the largest zones and also in the domestic market. For example, international shares account for nearly 30% of the funds that outperform their benchmarks. The Swiss equity markets account for 21.5% of these funds and Europe for 12.6%.
- The alpha measured over the different investment zones registers but a slight drop from last year. It is thus sufficiently significant in those zones that have the greatest concentration of funds. This is especially the case with products invested in international shares, where the average alpha rose to 2.44%.
- The bias of Swiss portfolios toward growth styles (to the detriment of value styles and small caps) has allowed them to maintain levels of alpha from one year to the next.
Download the Alpha League Table Switzerland 2008
[Consult previous editions]
United Kingdom
Alpha League Table UK 2008
The Alpha League Table 2008 for the United Kingdom reveals that:- The year’s results are better than last year’s: average alpha increased (approximately 30 basis points) to 2.9% and the average frequency of alpha is 52.2%; whereas it was 46.3% last year.
- The winner of the 2008 edition is Jupiter, which was ranked second last year. With its average alpha of 4.23% and the frequency with which alpha is delivered coming to 73.75%, the firm posts an impressive performance. Artemis Fund Managers, in its first appearance in the Alpha League Table, is in second place with an average alpha of 4.51% and frequency of 66.11%. In third place, as it was last year, is M&G which offers one of the widest ranges of funds. The alpha generated by the firm was measured at 4.38% and the frequency at 66.54%, improvements on last year.
- Five of the asset management firms are making their first appearance in the top ten: Artemis, Coutts, Allianz RCM, BNY Mellon / Newton and Threadneedle. The rankings also confirm the robustness of the asset management expertise of the firms that are making repeat appearances.
- As with the asset management studied in earlier issues of the Alpha League Table (France, Italy, Spain, Switzerland), it is in the home market that the greatest number of 4-star and 5-star funds are found.
- Moreover, the table once again confirms that, when it comes to alpha, UK asset managers outperform their counterparts in Europe. On average, 52.2% of UK funds deliver positive alpha. By comparison, frequency of positive alpha is 42.4% for Swiss funds, 30.7% for French funds, and 30% for Spanish funds.
- In addition, the average alpha produced by UK asset management firms is higher than that of other European asset managers (2.2% for France, 2.4% for Switzerland, 2% for Spain). It is in international equities that the superiority of UK asset managers is most evident. In this zone, they generate alpha of 3.8%, whereas French asset managers have an average of 2.64% and the Swiss 2.42%.
Download the Alpha League Table United Kingdom 2008
[Consult previous editions]
Methodology
For the first time in Europe, a ranking methodology provides a clear distinction between the talent behind the active management (alpha) and the other elements of performance that are linked to the market (beta).
The Alpha League Table, which is compiled using the Style Rating developed by EuroPerformance and EDHEC-Risk Institute, with scores of 4 and 5*, is the first European ranking system that rewards asset management companies on the basis of their capacity to generate alpha from their equity funds.
Alpha at the heart of management evaluation
At a time when passive management is growing considerably, it appears essential for the asset management industry and investors to be able to identify those talented active managers who are capable of providing their clients with an outperformance (alpha) that extends beyond the returns naturally generated by a fund's long-term exposure to market risks and different investment styles (beta).
When calculating alpha - the outperformance obtained by the asset managers above and beyond the "normal" returns achieved through exposure to market risks and investment styles - one must presume that a fund's risk exposure (beta) is determined precisely. The benchmark representing the risks actually taken by an asset manager is determined by analysing the fund's returns using a Return-Based Style Analysis, the method developed by Nobel Prize winner William Sharpe*.
Presentation of the Alpha League Table
The Alpha League Table provides a ranking of the best asset management companies in Europe on a quarterly basis. The table focuses each year on four European zones in particular: France, Italy and Spain, Switzerland and finally, the UK. This year's tables will again be divided up into four quarters.
The ranking is designed using a score based on the alpha intensity of each asset management company.
The Alpha League Table score: alpha intensity
The objective of the Alpha League Table is to allow asset management firms to be ranked according to their capacity to generate alpha frequently: alpha intensity.
Alpha intensity is the product of two indicators calculated using information from the EuroPerformance/EDHEC-Risk Institute Style Rating:
The alpha frequency in the investment product range, which is determined according to the number of funds with strictly positive alpha (4 or 5 stars in the Style Rating) out of all of a given company's rated funds;
The average alpha, which corresponds to the average percentage of alpha of the funds with strictly positive alpha (4 or 5 stars in the Style Rating).
The Alpha League Table alpha intensity score is the product of the alpha frequency and average alpha figures.
Example:
If company X has an alpha frequency of 30%, i.e. 3 funds out of 10 have received a score of 4 or 5 stars, and an average alpha (>0) score of 4%, then its final rating will be: 4% x 0.30 = 1.2%.
Similarly, if the company has a frequency figure of 50% and average alpha of 3%, its final score will be 3% x 0.50 = 1.5%.
Winners' circle
Each month, a ranking on the basis of this final score is established. Only those companies that have participated in the 12 monthly rankings are included in the annual one.
This year, the relevant calculations cover the period of January 2006 to December 2006.
In the final winners' circle, the companies are ranked according to the average of their 12 monthly scores.
Asset management firms included in the Alpha League Table
The companies included in the ranking must meet two criteria:- Eligibility in the market under analysis
All officially recognised asset management companies in the relevant zone are eligible for the Alpha League Table.
This year, foreign companies with no commercial activity in France are excluded. However, all managed and marketed funds in officially recognised companies are included, regardless of the fund’s country of domicile. When a company delegates the management of a fund to another company, the fund is considered as part of the secondary company for the purposes of the ranking.
- Statistics criteria
Because the table represents an assessment based on a company’s equity product range, only companies for whom at least 2/3 of this range has been analysed under the EuroPerformance/EDHEC-Risk Institute Style Rating are included.
Companies that meet the above criteria must have at least 6 rated funds under the EuroPerformance/EDHEC-Risk Institute Style Rating in order to qualify for the Alpha League Table. These must be divided into a minimum of four categories of analysis. Funds included in the final score
Equity funds are eligible for the Alpha League Table, on condition that they have been included in the EuroPerformance database and have been rated under the Style Rating, the scoring system developed by EuroPerformance and EDHEC-Risk Institute. For this to be the case, they must have been in existence for at least three years, must have provided returns for the full calculation period (156 weeks) with no more than two failures to do so, and must not belong to any of the following categories:- Gold and raw materials
- Real estate
- ETFs and all index-managed mutual funds
Style Rating
The EuroPerformance/EDHEC-Risk Institute Style Rating is based on three criteria:- Risk-adjusted performance (alpha)
- Potential for extreme loss (Value-at- Risk)
- Performance persistence
This scoring system incorporates the most advanced technical and conceptual research. It measures the quality of active management and then awards a score of 1 to 5 stars.
The 1- and 2-star categories contain funds that on average do not outperform their management objectives. The 3-star category represents funds whose performance is close to the returns achieved on the market in which they invest. 4 or 5 stars are awarded to funds that generate outperformance for the period under analysis. This is the product of management decisions: stock picking and/or market timing. Some of these high-performance funds offer significant gain frequency, indicating persistent outperformance. They are awarded the maximum score of 5 stars or 5*H, where the “H” symbolises the regularity with which they appear in the excess returns category.
About EuroPerformance
EuroPerformance, a fund analysis company, is a subsidiary of the FININFO group, the leading French financial information company. Specialised in data collection, EuroPerformance has developed tools with considerable value-added in the areas of performance and risk analysis through a broad referential database of European funds.
*"Asset Allocation Management Style and Performance Measurement", W.F. Sharpe, Journal of Portfolio Management, Vol 18, winter 1992, pp7-19
|
| EDHEC-Risk Alternative Indexes: January 2010 |
|