EDHEC-Risk Concept Industry Analysis Featured Analysis Latest EDHEC-Risk Surveys Research News Research Papers Books Features Interviews Indexes and Benchmarking EDHEC-Risk Efficient Equity Indices FTSE EDHEC-Risk ERAFP SRI Index Equity Index Research EDHEC-Risk Alternative Indexes Hedge Fund Index Research EDHEC-Risk IEIF Commercial Property Indices Amundi ETF "Core-Satellite and ETF Investment" Research Chair Solvency II Benchmarks Style and Performance Analysis Hedge Fund Performance EuroPerformance/EDHEC-Risk Institute Style Ratings Performance Measurement for Traditional Investment Asset Allocation and Alternative Diversification Real Assets Newedge "Advanced Modelling for Alternative Investments" Research Chair CME Group "Exploring the Commodity Futures Risk Premium: Implications for Asset Allocation and Regulation" Strategic Research Project SGCIB "Structured Equity Investment Strategies for Long-Term Asian Investors" Strategic Research Project Asset Allocation and Derivative Instruments Structured Forms of Investment Strategies FBF "Structured Products and Derivatives" Research Chair Eurex "The Benefits of Volatility Derivatives in Equity Portfolio Management" Strategic Research Project ALM and Asset Management AXA Investment Managers "Regulation and Institutional Investment" Research Chair BNP Paribas Investment Partners "ALM and Institutional Investment Management" Research Chair Deutsche Bank "Asset-Liability Management Techniques for Sovereign Wealth Fund Management" Research Chair Ontario Teachers' Pension Plan "Advanced Investment Solutions for Liability Hedging for Inflation Risk" Research Chair Rothschild & Cie "The Case for Inflation-Linked Corporate Bonds: Issuers' and Investors' Perspectives" Research Chair Russell Investments "Solvency II Benchmarks" Research Chair Operational Risks and Performance Best Execution: MiFID and TCA Mitigating Hedge Funds Operational Risks CACEIS "Risk and Regulation in the European Fund Management Industry" Research Chair EDHEC-Risk Publications Reports, Studies, Surveys and Position Papers Academic Publications All EDHEC-Risk Publications Events Events organised by EDHEC-Risk Institute Analysing Sovereign Risk for Portfolio Management Decisions Seminar, London, 12-13 June, 2012 CFA Institute/EDHEC-Risk Institute Advances in Asset Allocation Seminar, New York, 12-14 June, 2012 Advanced Commodity Investment Seminar, London, 19-20 June, 2012, New York, 16-17 July, 2012 New Frontiers in Equity Investing Seminar, Boston, 26-27 June, 2012 Events involving EDHEC-Risk Institute's participation EDHEC-Risk Institute Presentation Research Programmes Research Chairs and Strategic Research Projects Partnership IPE EDHEC-Risk Institute Research Insights International Advisory Board Team EDHEC-Risk News EDHEC-Risk Newsletter EDHEC-Risk Press Releases EDHEC-Risk in the Press Careers EDHEC Business School EDHEC-Risk Executive Education EDHEC-Risk Institute PhD in Finance EDHEC-Risk Institute Executive MSc in Risk and Investment Management Investment Management Seminars Contact Us Contact Us
EDHEC-Risk Executive Education

EDHEC-Risk Institute PhD in Finance - Testimonial: Christopher Taylor, Director at Black Pine Capital, Singapore, British, 50

Could you tell us about your background?

After graduating in Oriental Studies (Japanese) from Oxford in the early 1980s, I started out as a trainee in the investment department of a UK insurance company; there were not many people around to start with and following a raft of resignations, I was given the opportunity to run a fund from an early age.

After just a few years I was offered an opportunity to go to Asia to join an investment bank. In all, I worked for over fifteen years on the sell-side in Tokyo, Hong Kong, London and San Francisco, including a spell running a Japanese equity business.

It is in Hong Kong that I caught the ‘China bug’, which eventually led me to go back to school to do a Master’s in Chinese Studies. While I was there, Oxford started a Master’s in financial economics which I completed subsequently. Without a strong academic background in finance and economics, there was a steep learning curve but I thoroughly enjoyed the challenge.

After that, in 2006, with partners I founded a hedge fund business in London, specialising in Asian equities. Despite a very difficult market environment we managed decent performance; in particular, we gave investors a double-digit positive return in 2008. We moved the business to Singapore last year in order to be closer to markets and to the Asian investor base. Currently, I am looking to start a new Asian market neutral equity fund.

Why a PhD, why now?

I first thought of doing this following my last three year stint at Oxford, but I was aching to get back into the markets and had a great opportunity to do so.

At my age, it is not about career development or signalling; I literally want to learn more and advance my knowledge to the frontier. Rather than be a follower, I want to be in the vanguard. Self study is a possibility, but the exercise is much easier when you are among a group of smart and like-minded people. I also wanted to take my technical skills to a new level, but there too, it is difficult to do so without a frame of reference and outside help.

Why the EDHEC-Risk Institute PhD in Finance?

The programme is pretty much unique. First, it is deliberately tailored towards not only those who are working, but also people who are at a fairly advanced stage of their careers. The programme being offered both in Europe and Singapore was a significant plus for me and the ability to choose from a large portfolio of electives offered globally adds flexibility for everybody. Second, the quality and diversity of the core and affiliate faculty was extremely attractive – the wide range of faculty expertise is perfect for someone like me, whose chief problem is the large number of fields in which I am interested. I do not want to be involved in a monolithic project but instead explore different fields.

Did you have specific expectations about the programme?

I expected academic rigour and high standards of teaching and am not at all disappointed. I have been in new programmes before and also expected that it would attract more risk takers, which is a good thing. This being the first time the programme is offered in Singapore, I was surprised and impressed by the number of electives on offer here – one might have assumed this would start as a secondary operation, but we are getting an offering as rich and diverse as in the European chapter of the programme.

You are in the second half of your first year in the programme – have you had any ‘a-ha moments’ so far?

The core courses cover very different aspects of finance theory and practice, though there are many links, of course, in particular, the use of continuous time techniques throughout. I came to the continuous time finance course with some trepidation as stochastic calculus has a fearsome reputation, but Jakša Cvitanic’’s explanation is very practical and clear, and material that was previously rather mysterious is now much more clear. Bob Kimmel’s course on asset pricing goes much deeper into the consumption-based theoretical approach than I have seen previously. René Garcia’s course on empirical methods is both theoretically rigorous and practical, in particular, it cleared up some issues surrounding hypothesis testing for me. The corporate finance courses were the most wide-ranging as we were lucky enough to have two excellent lecturers, I could name many points but I particularly enjoyed the material regarding default and how firms may get there, and how to deal with the situation through renegotiation. Of course these models can be applicable to countries as well!

What about the research presentations?

I much enjoyed Florencio Lopez de Silanes’ presentation on the determinants of private equity returns. It is another good feature of the programme to have these monthly presentations that are extremely focused, present new material, and give students a taste of the research process. And it is a magnificent opportunity to have access to all past presentations via the online platform.

Do you already know in what direction you want to take your research?

It is still early to tell. What I know already is that I am torn between doing something that relates directly to what I do on a day-to-day basis and doing something that would be completely unrelated to it. Maybe I will do one project of each.

Who do you think this programme is for?

I would say this is for a wide range of people, from professionals doing it for their own fulfilment to people, typically younger than I, who also seek career benefits associated with the knowledge and research and technical skills gained. It is also for people who are thinking of going into academe. The only caveat is that they have to be reasonably confident in their technical abilities.

No one should be afraid to apply; many have the capabilities and drive but may have reservations because they have been away from school. It is the role of the admissions committee to assess how candidates fit and suggest remedial actions where needed, so interested people should not self-censor or be shy and just go ahead.